Sunday, June 28, 2009

Y! Alert: The Full Feed from HuffingtonPost.com

Yahoo! Alerts
My Alerts

The latest from The Full Feed from HuffingtonPost.com

Justice Department Backs Some Constitutional Rights For Detainees Top
The Justice Department has determined that detainees tried by military commissions in the U.S. can claim at least some constitutional rights, particularly protection against the use of statements taken through coercive interrogations, officials said. The conclusion, explained in a confidential memorandum whose contents were shared with The Wall Street Journal, could alter significantly the way the commissions operate -- and has created new divisions among the agencies responsible for overseeing the commissions.
 
Jim Impoco: Hurricane Michael Top
In September 1987, I thought I had landed the big one, a career-making exclusive with a reclusive superstar. I was a staff reporter for the Associated Press in Tokyo and what the Japanese were calling Hurricane Michael was coming to town. It was a big deal. This was Michael Jackson's first world solo tour, and his first live performance since the successful Victory Tour with his brothers four years earlier. But a lot had transpired in Jackson-ology since 1985, when the family performed live. Michael Jackson hadn't yet been accused of child molestation, but he was getting a lot of press for his increasingly oddball behavior. The extreme-sport plastic surgery press obsession was in its infancy. And he had just been in the news for publicly conveying a desire to buy the remains of Elephant Man, suggesting he identified with the horribly deformed Englishman who was then the subject of a successful art house film by David Lynch. And of course, there was Bubbles, his pet chimpanzee. Bubbles had arrived in Japan on a separate flight. There were reports in the Japanese press, of course unconfirmed, that Michael Jackson had demanded that the wallpaper in his pet's room be changed, because Bubbles was hypersensitive to cigarette smoke. At the time, the Japanese would not have been characterized as leading edge anti-smokers, which made the incident all the more amusing. (American was already getting a reputation as a prude around the world, though eventually most nations got on board with the no-smoking thing.) In what seemed to me a remarkable diss to Japan, Jackson had announced that he would kick off the tour not in America but in Tokyo, which he said would allow him the luxury of polishing his act. It seemed to suggest that Jackson, or his handlers, considered the Japanese easy to please. No, his publicists said, it's just that Michael Jackson is, as you know, a perfectionist. It was a zen koan: aren't you confirming our notion that this is a dig, however unintentional, at the Japanese. Starting the tour in Japan, followed by Australia and then Europe, was clever from a public relations perspective. The press coverage, while ample, was far more manageable because most of the reporters were local. The Associated Press, to name the example I was most familiar with, was sending Japan-based reporters to cover the event. And I was given the assignment. Jann Wenner's Rolling Stone magazine wasn't sending anyone to cover the opening concert, though it wanted someone on the ground. A friend had suggested me, and in my fleeting Almost Famous moment, I would file the main story about the concert for the storied music magazine. It ran in front of the book at some 400 words or so. I'd dictated it to the Rolling Stone editor from a telephone booth outside the stadium. Barack Obama hadn't invented the Internet yet. Working with Jackson's handlers before the first concert, I developed a relationship with one of them, whose name I shall protect. We seemed to be bonding, and in the hours before the concert, I worked him. Next thing I knew he promised me an interview with Michael Jackson the next morning. I was feeling pretty good about life. The press seats were great for the concert at Korakuen Stadium in Tokyo, home of the Yomiuri Giants, the Yankees of Japanese baseball. Jackson was in top form and the audience went wild. The next morning I showed up at 8 a.m. at the Tokyo Capital Hotel, where Jackson was staying, and went to the meeting place the publicist had specified. ABC's Good Morning America aired the night Jackson opened in Tokyo, half a day ahead of the U.S. time-zone-wise, and the best they could do was his composer Quincy Jones, who was in Japan with the star. My heart was racing as he greeted me enthusiastically. It was real. The interview was happening. Still smiling, he told me that Michael, unfortunately, couldn't make it. But the publicist figured since I had made the trip over, he'd line up someone else: Jimmy Osmond. The irony. The cruelty. Jimmy Osmond was the youngest Osmond Brother, the band that competed briefly with the Jackson 5 as The Most Important Band In America. Jimmy, who is 46 today and looks a lot younger, had by then reinvented himself as a broker to the stars. He handled the deal between Jackson and the Japanese television networks, among other things. He seemed like a great guy. I felt like a jerk afterwards, like One Bad Apple but I told him 'no thanks' and left. More on Michael Jackson
 
Amelia Templeton: U.S. Men's Soccer Team Takes Second in Confederations Cup: Goalie Howard, Defender Onyewu's Head lead the US effort to stop Brazil Top
After a thrilling and unlikely first half lead, the US men's soccer team lost 3-2 to Brazil in the FIFA Confederations Cup final today at Ellis Park Stadium in Johannesburg. For an American soccer enthusiast abroad like myself, it was crushing to watch our modest home team come so close to beating the juggernaut that is Brazil, only to lose in the last minutes of the game. As a cruelly accurate banner one South African football fan was holding read, "USA, no you can't." The United States played a largely defensive game despite scoring two elegant goals in the first thirty minutes of the match, with Brazil taking 28 shots on goal total compared to only eight for the Americans. For 74 giddy minutes of play Brazil's dominance in attacks and possession of the ball didn't seem to matter, as the United States' defense doggedly shut down plays by Brazil's star forwards Kaka and Fabiano. The loyalty of the crowd began to shift from Brazil to the United States in the stadium, with one fan near me excitedly blurting out "Obama"! As another South African fan had explained to me earlier, "we're mainly for Brazil, but it's okay with us if the United States wins, because they're the underdog." The top of U.S. defender Oguchi Onyewu's head was arguably the star of much of the game; a half a dozen times at least, Onyewu dove to head away a dangerous shot or cross. Goalkeeper Tim Howard was everywhere he needed to be, and exuded upbeat confidence that seemed to keep the whole team going, offering low-key high fives to his teammates after they cleared the ball. Near the end of the first half, after a breakaway by Andre Santos seemed sure to end in a goal for Brazil, Howard made a brilliant point-blank save. But Brazil kept the attacks coming in the second half of the game, and they wore the United States down. In just the first minute of the second half, Brazilian forward Fabiano turned, shot, and scored in one brilliant fluid movement. After that Brazil seemed to find its strength as the United States lost energy and confidence. Howard gave up two more goals, none of which he could have prevented, and what could have been the United States greatest win became a respectable loss. Clint Dempsey, who scored the first goal of the game for the United States, was in tears as he accepted a bronze individual award for outstanding play. There's no shame in loosing to Brazil 3-2, and their second place finish in the Confederations Cup was still an upset of sorts for the United States. Now, if only the team can figure out how to mount a real offense before the 2010 World Cup... More on Brazil
 
Deepak Chopra: High on Fame: Michael Jackson and Enabling Doctors Top
A tragic case like Michael Jackson's reinforces the recurring story of addicted celebrities and their enabling doctors. Being a celebrity does not change the simple fact that the user is a drug addict. And having an M.D. after your name does not change the fact that if you supply the addict you're still a drug pusher. But to be famous and addicted does make treatment much more difficult. Whether or not Michael Jackson's sudden death was directly caused by prescription drugs, this tragedy highlights the need to crackdown on M.D.s who become enablers of addiction. It's no exaggeration to say that they are basically drug pushers or at least suppliers. Their role although perhaps well meaning can become genuinely sinister, for it's not just a matter of joining a star's entourage by virtue of a prescription pad. Physicians are quite aware of the potential for addiction with opiate/opioid pain medication. The same narcotics like Demerol and OxyContin that became a regular part of Michael's life also lead to high addiction rates among physicians themselves. In the celebrity culture, some doctors become co-dependent and enmeshed with the stars to whom they hitch themselves, creating a mix of compulsions for fame, approval, power, and self-indulgence. As with other enablers in their entourage, the doctor is unable to set limits, frustrate and confront the celebrity lest the physician be banished and another eager medical provider step in. But the bottom line is always the same: the standard of care has not been maintained; pain and potentially treatable conditions are overlooked. And their oaths as physicians have been violated. These doctors are doing harm. Without a doubt, enabling M.D.s are hard to control, since they can hide behind any number of excuses, the favorite one being that the celebrity himself (or herself) deceived them. "I had no idea he was that strung out, and anyway, he had a dozen other doctors he was fooling." A familiar rationale and a credible one -- addicts who aren't celebrities devise contorted ways of getting drugs. Celebrities are better at it and can dismiss anyone who doesn't agree to play along with their addictive lifestyle. Merely because a drug is prescribed or even taken as directed does not mean the patient is not addicted. The community of physicians needs to show more vigilance when dealing with these difficult patients. Serious medical issues must be faced, among them: -- Celebrities are known to have higher rates of trauma in their childhood, whether physical, sexual, or emotional. Behind the glitter of fame they feel real pain and suffer from conditions that need serious medical and psychiatric treatment. -- The narcissism of celebrities looks glamorous -- who wouldn't want to be the center of attention? -- but in fact it is actually a symptom of psychological damage. There's a frightened refusal to look at their problems and an inability to see how much they themselves are contributing to the turmoil that uproots everyday existence. (To make matters worse, the enabling doctors have their own narcissistic issues, which may be gratified by basking in the glow of celebrity. Doctors, too, may be defensive and manifest the same refusal to take responsibility.) -- The use of short-acting painkillers isn't innocuous. These can cause changes in the brain that impair thinking and perception. After a certain point, the addicted brain sends the message that getting off drugs will be like committing suicide. Under heavy use, painkillers are in fact the cause of pain, a condition known as hyperalgesia. But reckless doctors keep supplying pills and injections because "my patient is in pain." This ignores the simple fact that pain can be managed in many ways. Even if narcotics are called for, that's not the same as saying they are called for at addictive or dangerous levels. -- Opiates suppress respiration, but often this effect isn't noticed until suddenly the addict stops breathing completely. Subjectively they may not feel sedated even as larger and larger doses are given over time (known medically as drug tolerance or tachyphylaxis). A drug can stop producing the desired effect after only one dose. The addict wants subjective relief, but as larger doses continue to have no greater effect, the addict fails to notice that his body is suffering from serious side effects. This is one of the covert causes of sudden death. The list of risks extends much farther, but the overall point is that trained physicians know of these dangers. Therefore, participating in an escalating daily regimen of opiates for any patient with probable addiction, much less a celebrity is indefensible. Ignorance is no defense if you have a medical license. What can be done? The public's attention span is short, but widespread awareness is the first step. The real target audience are the local licensing boards and peer review committees who handle medical practice. The culture of "just say yes" when a celebrity shows up in a doctor's office needs to be condemned. This condemnation needs to be followed up with serious consequences for enabling physicians. If they recklessly addict a patient, severe repercussions should follow. If they themselves are addicted, complete abstinence must be achieved before they are allowed to return to medical practice, and random drug testing should be required by all states. Computerized medical histories should be instituted, so that we know precisely how many prescriptions are being written by each doctor and filled by each patient. With a centralized database, celebrities won't be able to pull off the trick of fooling dozens doctors and pharmacists all over town. And we need to do a better job educating physicians about the nuances and difficulties of treating patients such as these. These steps are a beginning. Realistically, celebrities will always be first in line in gaining easy access to drugs. They have the means, the excuses, the money, and the opportunity. But at the very least the culture of enabling physicians must be branded as shameful. The same image that fools the public has eroded medical ethics. The abuse of prescription medication is becoming an alarming problem in this country, It's not fun to take drugs, it is serious business as is our charge to care for patients, celebrity or not. Doctors that enable celebrities must be brought to justice or else we will continue to witness shattered lives and sudden death. Read Dr. Drew Pinsky on Huffington Post and at dr.drew.com Follow Deepak Chopra on Twitter More on Michael Jackson
 
Jim Jaffe: How To Fix Health -- Use Less Top
No health reform plan will succeed unless it cuts consumption. Today's debate, with its focus on refighting old wars and settling old scores, is straying from this focus. There's very broad agreement that our national health bill is becoming unaffordable. So unless we cut costs for those now insured we won't be able to extend coverage to the uninsured. Administrative reforms won't do the trick. Paying providers less via a government plan that sets low prices won't work either. Past efforts to do so have seen volume expand to more than compensate for the loss of income. Ultimately, the system must provide fewer services. That doesn't mean the sick will be denied what they need. In an environment where an estimated 30% of spending - including a large number of unneeded tests and procedures as well as some bloated administrative expenses - is wasted, everyone can be provided with what's necessary. Some call that rationing, but that's simplistic and misleading. Any environment where everyone can't have anything anytime involves choices and priorities. That's what life is all about. So far, no society has been able to overcome this constraint and there's no reason to believe anyone will anytime soon. Too many are now invested in a series of side debates irrelevant to this central issue. The existence of a public plan won't cut consumption unless it includes limits on services like those now imposed by Medicare and once used by private firms during the managed care effort. A public plan isn't a prerequisite for imposing such limits. Changing the tax status of employer-provided insurance won't make much difference either. If four-fifths of our health bill is run up by the one fifth among us who are very sick, changing the behavior of those who are well will have a marginal impact at best. And asking those who are sick to shop in a dysfunctional market that lacks reliable signals about price or quality makes little sense. America could simply decide that health is a top priority and make a commitment to spend whatever it takes to provide universal insurance, but there's little sentiment for moving in that direction. State after state has pulled back from Medicaid expansions in response to budget pressures. The electorate is not willing to write a blank check and our political leaders are reluctant to try to lead in that direction. We're now witnessing a political two-step where there's a hope that the extra expense of covering the uninsured in the short run will be largely offset by greater long-run efficiencies in a reformed system. In terms of expense, phase one is a certainty and phase two, the reformed system, is a theory. Turning that theory into practice won't be easy and may not be possible unless there's an acknowledgement at the outset about the need to reduce consumption. More on Taxes
 
Stephen Schlesinger: How the UN is Faring Under Ban Ki Moon Top
Days after Sri Lanka's government defeated its long-time foe, the Tamil Tigers, in May, United Nations Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon flew into the country's capital, Colombo, for a 24-hour visit to urge its president to open up its refugee camps to international aid groups. This was another urgent trip by Ban to a war-torn capital, as part of his regular duties as the UN's chief representative, seeking to uphold peace and restore global comity. But who really knew much about this latest foray into a troubled region by the UN chief? Not many. Ban, who has just marked the half-way point in his five-year term in office, has so far been unable to attract a large worldwide audience for his activities. This is due, in part, to a stylistic reasons, but also to the vagaries of UN diplomacy. Still in his quiet way, Ban is spending more than a third of his time on the road, and has accomplished much over the past 30 months. In Darfur, he managed to get African Union peacekeepers into Sudan's killing zone in his first year in office through intensive behind-the-scenes diplomacy. Though the political process has since stalled, he has pushed for more peacekeepers and helicopters. In Kosovo, Ban was able to lower the temperature on the boiling issue of the province's independence. He persuaded the European Union and the United States to allow continued UN oversight in Kosovo while gradually permitting self-governance - all without triggering dangerous confrontations with the two states which oppose its breakaway, Serbia and its close ally, Russia. In Myanmar, despite bitter resistance from the military regime, Ban pressured the authorities to let in humanitarian aid after Cyclone Nargis devastated the country last year. His public and private entreaties, including dozens of phone calls and meetings, saved perhaps a half-million lives. Today, he continues his call for the release of the democracy leader, Aung San Suu Kyi. In Haiti, which still suffers from underdevelopment, political turmoil, and the effects of destructive hurricanes, Ban appointed former US President Bill Clinton as his Special Representative to help deal with the country's plight. This followed two visits he made to Haiti over the past 18 months and a donor's conference he sponsored in April that sought to raise $300 million in aid and investment. More recently, Ban took an active role in the Gaza crisis. He has regularly defended the Palestinians' rights to a state, but he also condemned Hamas's rocket attacks on southern Israel. During the fighting in Gaza, he publicly demanded a halt to the warfare and requested that Israel open Gaza's borders to relief aid. He also visited the UN compound in the center of Gaza to express the UN's grave concern over its bombing. Ban has taken a leadership position on the problem of global warming. He tackled the issue at the Bali Conference of 2007, made it one of his central concerns at the UN, and will attempt to forge a new agreement among all global states at the UN Conference in Copenhagen in December 2009. And he has moved forward in the health field. He accelerated efforts to eliminate the world's most dangerous ancient scourge, malaria, by naming a special adviser on the disease, and by forging innovative partnerships within the UN system that have brought together private industry, foundations, and non-governmental organizations. His campaign has already helped to reduce the incidence of malaria. The problem for Ban is his diffident manner, which stands in stark contrast with that of his predecessor, Kofi Annan, a larger than life secretary-general who dominated the scene through his flair, eloquence, and star power. Ban, by contrast, is neither charismatic nor an inspirational speaker - indeed, his English is not as good as Annan's. In his own way, though, he is an engaging, polite man, hip to contemporary cultural icons, and even given to singing at public occasions with wry lyrics and verses. Nonetheless Ban is sometimes criticized for not doing more, not listening enough, or deferring too much to the Big Five countries on the Security Council. One of the main complaints is that communicating with him can be difficult. Ban invariably nods his head in polite agreement without giving clear guidance. Others say he has yet to prove he is a good manager and must push harder for internal management reforms at the UN. Ban, in turn, has openly chastised member states for not giving him sufficient resources. But, wherever the truth may lie, few critics take into account that he, like all former UN chief executives, has to deal with the reality that he possesses only moral power, not economic, military, or political power. Still throughout his tenure, Ban has consistently displayed progressive instincts on issues, despite the fact that his candidacy was originally championed by an authoritarian Chinese government and a right-wing, UN-bashing American envoy to the organization, John Bolton. In the end he should be measured by what he has accomplished rather than by personal foibles or flatness of style. More on Sri Lanka
 
Mallika Chopra: Bloodsuckers and the World of Michael Jackson Top
In the aftermath of Michael Jackson's death, I found myself in a surreal situation that gave me a glimpse into the dark side of bloodsuckers, media and celebrity. In those few hours, I saw a side of humanity that saddens me - where people try to take advantage of vulnerability, confusion, and grief for their own advantage. I realized that much of media has so much more to gain when they report salacious gossip, even in the aftermath of a tragic death like Michael's. I also realized that all of us, myself included, who participate in the engagement of that media feed so-called journalists to do anything to get their information. In the end, personalities like Michael are portrayed as freaks and dysfunctional, people who love them are taken advantage of, and those seedy, washed out journalists profit. I share my experience because it involves Grace Rwaramba, who served as the nanny to Michael's three kids. Grace is more than my best friend - I refer to her as my sister, and she thinks of my parents as her own (she actually calls my father papa). In the last day in the aftermath of Michaels death, recent quotes have surfaced about her life with Michael, as well as speculation about her role in potential custody battles for the three children. Grace has read this article before I published it. Michael had a pattern of letting those close to him in and out of his life, and Grace was no exception. Lisa Marie Presley’s reflection on her emotional relationship with Michael expressed beautifully the power Michael had with those he loved. Over the years, Grace faced a similar cycle of wanting to save him and being hurt by him. It was an endless cycle that seemed similar to those faced by friends and families of other addicts. Michael had a knack of surrounding himself with enablers, and avoiding people who wanted to help him like his family, real friends who cared deeply about him, Grace and my father, Deepak Chopra. Daphne Barak, a so-called journalist who claims to be a friend of the Jackson family and who got to know Grace through them, has been cultivating a friendship with Grace over several years. Unfortunately, the story with Daphne and Grace seems to be one that echoes the vultures that took advantage of Michael throughout his life. Daphne reached out to Grace a few weeks ago, when she knew she was in a vulnerable place, having recently been let go by Michael yet again (this was a regular pattern). In the 17 years that Grace has worked with Michael, she has never spoken to the press. She loves Michael and his children at her core. Grace genuinely believed Daphne was her friend who was trying to help her. Daphne had offered to help Grace launch a foundation she was creating to monitor non profit work in Africa. (Grace was originally from Rwanda.) She told Grace that they should record her speaking about the work. However, every time they began to record, her questions would center on Michael. Grace would say she was uncomfortable speaking about him. On the morning of June 26th, after finding out that Grace was also in London, I rushed to her hotel. She was staying in a suite with Daphne. Daphne told tell me she had invited Grace to stay with her in Switzerland as her guest, and how she had helped Grace with the immediate aftermath of shock hearing about Michael's death. She said that she had spent several thousand dollars to buy a business class ticket for Grace to fly to LA. She boasted about how close she was to the Jackson family, world leaders, etc. I witnessed Daphne act as a friend while trying to bait information from Grace on her conversations with Jackson family members and friends about his death. She warned Grace that the family was going to try to set her up for Michaels downfall, and that it was critical that Grace speak with a lawyer before leaving. As a friend, she had organized a "lawyer" to get Grace's story before she left for the airport. In essence, Daphne was setting up a scenario to garner more information from Grace before she left for LA. I discovered that one of her friends who happened to be there had made a documentary on Princess Diana. When we tried to leave, Daphne screamed at Grace - in front of my young children who began to cry -- that she was an ingrate. She had spent thousands of dollars hosting her, she was her guest, and she wanted to spend the time to say goodbye. (Daphne obviously could not believe her luck that she had baited Grace as a sympathetic friend for stories before he died, and had Grace with her on that sad day.) Ultimately, Daphne, having obviously drunk a bit much, threatened to release the recordings she had made of their private conversations. Grace was petrified. I held her by the shoulders, looked in her eyes, and said lets just go. So what, let her put it out there. She is a washed up journalist trying to mine a tragic situation. Michael was gone now, and the future is the wellbeing of the children. Grace agreed. Ultimately, I had to get the hotel manager involved to escort Grace out of the hotel. I also bought Grace's ticket home myself, discovering that Daphne had misled us about the time and the price. It was a 650 Pound economy ticket, not several thousand dollars. Twenty four hours later, I found that Daphne indeed had written an article full of quotes by Grace for a tabloid magazine. (A quick search of her other work not surprisingly shows she did a recent feature on Amy Winehouse.) Grace's quotes are now being picked up by other tabloids and will find their way into more magazines and articles. (People Magazine is also featuring some today, including the inaccurate claim the Grace pumped Michael's stomach several times. For the record, Grace never pumped Michael's stomach. She has no idea how she would even do such a thing.) Which quotes are true, which are in context, (many are not) to me frankly doesn't matter. I will not be surprised if Daphne releases audios or videos soon. Grace feels used, insecure and shaken that she could have been so naïve, particularly having witnessed so many vultures in Michael's world over the years. She made a mistake. The sad truth is that when you are a celebrity, or a close friend or family of one, in a world of tabloids, you must be impeccable in what you say and to whom. Michael probably faced the epitome of vultures, bloodsuckers and hanger-ons displayed in his endless cycle of managers, enabling doctors, and new business partners. How could anyone blame him for becoming so paranoid in his life? In the article, Daphne tries to portray a rift between Katherine Jackson and Grace. This is not true. I would like to go on record, with Grace's permission, to say that Grace firmly hopes that the Jackson family gets custody of Prince, Paris and Michael. It would be detrimental to the children to be separated, and they should be with Michael's family. They should know their grandparents, aunts, uncles, and cousins, and they should learn about who he was as a person, not just as an icon. She has no interest in custody, and just wants the children to be happy and secure. She will be there for them whenever they need or want her. As for the appetite for the salacious details of Michael's life, my hope is that we let him go in peace. We already know he led a tortured life. He also led a great one in which he loved, and was loved, by many. Let his family heal, and let his fans celebrate his music and his giving heart. This post was originally posted on www.intent.com. Mallika Chopra is the founder of Intent.com , a site focused on personal, social and global wellness More on Michael Jackson
 
GroundReport: Mir Hossein Mousavi arrested in Iran Top
Originally published on GroundReport.com , the world's most trusted citizen journalism network. By GroundReport Partner Breaking Tweets GroundReport Editor's Note: The following report is unconfirmed and we do not certify its accuracy. We will continue to update as facts emerge. Breaking Tweets can confirm via reliable sources that Mir Houssein Mousavi has been arrested in Iran. He was arrested at approximately 9:30 p.m. Sunday in Tehran. Mousavi lost June 12's presidential election to Mahmoud Ahmadinejad in a landslide, even though the results were expected to be close. It has sparked controversy in the days since and Mousavi supporters have organized protests. The first to tweet about the news is Omid Habibinia, an Iranian journalist who lives in exile in Switzerland. Iranian-American Lily Mazahery, a lawyer and human rights activist who is well-connected in Iran, also confirmed the story. Mazahery has previously used Twitter to break major news stories from Iran before the media such as Roxana Saberi's release and Delara Derabi's execution. Ebrahim Nabavi, an Iranian satirist and writer currently living in Belgium, posted about the arrest on his Facebook account. A Twitterer in Iran also confirmed the news, but the user name will remain anonymous to protect the user's identity. Go to GroundReport.com for more coverage from Iran . GroundReport is a citizen journalism platform that allows anyone to publish global news and earn money. More on Iranian Election
 

CREATE MORE ALERTS:

Auctions - Find out when new auctions are posted

Horoscopes - Receive your daily horoscope

Music - Get the newest Album Releases, Playlists and more

News - Only the news you want, delivered!

Stocks - Stay connected to the market with price quotes and more

Weather - Get today's weather conditions




You received this email because you subscribed to Yahoo! Alerts. Use this link to unsubscribe from this alert. To change your communications preferences for other Yahoo! business lines, please visit your Marketing Preferences. To learn more about Yahoo!'s use of personal information, including the use of web beacons in HTML-based email, please read our Privacy Policy. Yahoo! is located at 701 First Avenue, Sunnyvale, CA 94089.
Posted by at

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)