Monday, June 8, 2009

Y! Alert: The Full Feed from HuffingtonPost.com

Yahoo! Alerts
My Alerts

The latest from The Full Feed from HuffingtonPost.com

Volvo S40 DRIVe: Greenest Car Of The Year Top
It may not be a streamlined hybrid, a futuristic electric vehicle or a snazzy biofuel car, but a distinctly boxy diesel Volvo has won What Car? magazine's award for the year's greenest car.
 
Charles J. Brown: Can We Make "Buying American" Cool Again? Top
In the department of "you've got to be freaking kidding me," some on the (far) right are arguing that Americans should refuse to buy Chrysler and General Motors products as long as the Government (and in some cases the United Auto Workers) own a stake ( h/t ). Let's start with that paradigm of patriotism, Rush Limbaugh : Nobody wants to support an Obama company. For those of you for those of you that work at GM you have to understand the people angry are not angry at you. They're not angry at General Motors. The people saying they don't want to buy anything at General Motors are not mad at General Motors. They don't want to patronize Obama. They don't want to do anything to make Obama's policies work! This is an untold story, by the way. Of course, the government-controlled media is not gonna report anything like this but there are a lot of people who are not going to buy from Chrysler or General Motors as long as it is perceived Barack Obama is running it, because people do not want his policy to work here because this is antithetical to the American economic way of life. The government does not own car companies; the government does not design cars, not in a country that works. So people aren't going to buy products from companies that Obama runs. Limbaugh goes on to insist that he doesn't want GM to fail, but he then says this in response to a caller: Anyway, the point is, be it General Motors, be it Chrysler -- whatever else Obama ends up controlling and running -- the American people are not going to want it to succeed. So I want all of you who work at General Motors and all of you who are members of labor unions to understand that the opposition to you is not because of you. Limbaugh isn't alone. Hugh Hewitt has called for a boycott : In the effort to reverse this lurch beyond the farthest left fringe of previous Democratic statist urges, individual Americans have a role to play. They have to say no to GM products and services until such time as the denationalization occurs. This is a painful conclusion for those of us with friends still working for the company, and who had supported aggressive efforts to help the private company restructure. But there isn't any alternative, every dollar spent with GM is a dollar spent against free enterprise. Every car or truck purchased from Government Motors is one not purchased from a private car company that competes fairly against all other car companies. There's even an online petition going around (screenshot via The Detroit Bureau ): This is crazy. Instead of Buy American, some on the right want you to Boycott American. (Imagine what these guys' response would be if the French or the Chinese were to suggest that.) Perhaps the best response to this foolishness is to buy an American car . GM has nearly a dozen new cars already on the market or about to roll out that compete with or beat the best that other car companies have to offer. Ford is producing some spiffy models as well. The problem, of course, is that in far too many circles, American-made cars are still regarded as little better than junk. As WaPo's Warren Brown noted back in March, Let's be frank about this. Let's be clear. For the past year, as the national economy began to unwind, particularly that part of it represented by the automobile industry, we heard lots of talk from Capitol Hill about Detroit's need to "restructure," Detroit's need to make cars, and fewer trucks, that "Americans want to buy." It was bunk fueled by bias. The self-evident portion of that bunk is that 48 percent of the new cars and trucks sold in this country are built by General Motors, Ford and Chrysler. That's pretty darned good defense of a home market that is wide open to car manufacturers from all over the world, including foreign manufacturers ably assisted by hundreds of millions of dollars in tax breaks from states seeking new factories. The bias is more subtle. To detect it, you have to spend time trolling the garages and parking lots of Capitol Hill. Lots of Acura, Audi, BMW, Honda, Mercedes-Benz and Toyota cars are in those places. After a while, it becomes clear that it's not so much that Detroit does not make cars Americans want to buy. What's obvious is that many of the people who were sent to Washington to represent America are no longer interested in taking what America is making. . . Detroit makes good cars. The only people who don't know that are people, who for reasons both valid and ill-founded, long ago abandoned Detroit. But it's not just politicians. If you live in a big city outside of the industrial Midwest, look around. Hardly anyone drives American cars anymore. And tell the truth -- whenever someone you know has bought an American car, weren't you just a little bit surprised? Didn't you wonder why they didn't buy the comparable Toyota or Honda (or Lexus or BMW)? To be completely transparent, I'm as guilty of this as anyone -- we bought a Volvo S40 in 2006, and didn't even look at American brands when we shopped. It's time to face facts. For far too long, liberals have bought foreign brands. Owning a foreign car is as much a part of the lefty/coastie/academic community's self-image as lattes, Whole Foods, yoga, and Mac laptops. We -- all of us, including me -- need to acknowledge our share of the responsibility for having "abandoned Detroit." We need to understand that any effort to rebuild the American auto industry requires each of us to start buying American again. If you really care about the American worker, if you really want to help turn around the economy, and if you really want President Obama to succeed, there is nothing more important that you could do today. As Hewett noted, we all have an individual role to play. Let's change the way we think and what we regard as trendy. It's not like we have to sacrifice for this to happen. Detroit is producing great cars these days. And many are cheaper than their foreign competition. They should be flying off the lots. And right now, they're not. Let's make buying American cars cool again. Let's make it so that movie stars will want to arrive at the Oscars in Ford Fusions instead of Toyota Priuses. Let's make it so that high school boys will want to drive Mustangs, Camaros, and Tesla Roadsters instead of Porsches and Lamborghinis. Let's make it so that athletes will want buy the Cadillac STS instead of the BMW 5 series. Let's make it so cool that one day soon, Rush Limbaugh will mock a progressive candidate for President because she drives a Chevy Volt. More on Barack Obama
 
Ten Banks Get Approval To Repay TARP Top
The Treasury is preparing to announce tomorrow it will let 10 banks buy back government shares, people familiar with the matter said, signaling confidence some of the largest U.S. lenders won't again need a taxpayer rescue. More on The Bailouts
 
Carol Felsenthal: When Barack Took Michelle to NYC -- No Big Deal When You're POTUS Top
Still another column, this one in the Sunday New York Times about Barack Obama last week taking Michelle on a date to Manhattan. Jan Hoffman writes glowingly about Barack; if he can find time for a "date night" after 16 years of marriage and a plate overflowing with downright scary issues, why can't any guy? President Obama is not any guy. The reservation at a trendy restaurant and tickets for a Broadway show were surely obtained by one or more of scores of staffers and personal aides who are at the First Family's beck and call. Air Force One at the ready? Backup planes for security and press? Of course. Helicopters to shuttle them curbside? And no worry about babysitters; not only is the most famous live-in mother-in-law likely available, but if she's not, someone can fill in. Bo need to be walked? Again, someone can fill in. After the show (and the plane-ride to DC), there's no stop for milk at the all-night grocery or convenience store, no grubby kitchen to clean, none of the usual kid-caused messes; the inevitable price for an evening out that moms, especially, come to dread but expect. Will the Obamas worry as they try to fall to sleep about money spent that night on a dinner already consumed and a play already seen? No. Obama is a multimillionaire, he earns a great salary, enjoys an expense account, and his earning potential is many times greater than any president in history. If Bill Clinton got $12 million for his memoir, just imagine how much Obama will command. The conceit that President Obama is just a guy working to keep the romance in his marriage is ridiculous. He may well be working to keep the romance in his marriage, but he will never again be just a guy.
 
Is Fascism On The March Again In Europe? Historians Give Their Verdicts Top
Does the election of two BNP MEPs and the success of the far right elsewhere in Europe mean we are facing the threat of fascism? Or is this just a protest vote that will quickly fade? Leading historians give their verdicts More on Europe
 
Stewart Acuff: Broadening the Campaign for the Employee Free Choice Act Top
Today at noon Mayor Carl Redus of Pine Bluff, Arkansas hosted a meeting for the AFL-CIO with the Arkansas Conference of Black Mayors. Twenty or so mayors were at the lunch meeting at the Pine Bluff Ramada Conference Center. The mayors agreed to write Senator Lincoln individual letters asking her to support the Employee Free Choice Act. At their next meeting they will consider a formal resolution of support. When the Arkansas Conference of Black Mayors passes that resolution, they will join the Arkansas Legislative Black Caucus and the Arkansas Democratic Party Black Caucus in formally supporting and pressing for the Employee Free Choice Act. And so, the campaign to pass the Employee Free Choice Act continues to broaden. At Senator Lincoln's office in Little Rock - also today - the AFL-CIO's community affiliate, Working America, delivered another thousand handwritten letters. Also, today in D.C. the AFL-CIO releases 1000 businesses who have signed on to support the Employee Free Choice Act. Three hundred of those businesses are in Arkansas. Both nationally and in targeted states, every element of the Democratic Party is stepping up to demand that Democratic Senators support the Employee Free Choice Act. Democratic mayors and state legislators have the small political organizations that keep their creators elected and are called on to deliver the energy, enthusiasm, and votes to elect Democrats statewide. Black elected officials and union leaders and activist are central to Democratic Get Out the Vote operations. Democrats don't win statewide elections without them. Some members of the U.S. Senate have made decisions to support the Employee Free Choice Act based on principle and values. Some are making political calculations. The AFL-CIO is painstakingly making the political calculations for Members of the Senate: Black elected officials, faith leaders, small businesses, community organizations, union members and activists. All are necessary for Democratic victories each November. All are calling for passage of the Employee Free Choice Act.
 
Poll: Majority Of New Yorkers Say Bloomberg Doesn't Deserve Another Term Top
Despite generally broad approval for the job Michael R. Bloomberg has done as mayor, a majority of New Yorkers say that he does not deserve another term in office and that they would like to give someone else a chance, according to a poll conducted by The New York Times, Cornell University and NY1 News.
 
Iran's Main Nuclear Plant Expanding Rapidly, Says IAEA Top
Month by month, experts chart how Iran installs more centrifuges inside its underground plant in Natanz, where these machines are used to enrich uranium. This highly sensitive process, which breaches five UN Resolutions, could be used either to produce fuel for nuclear power stations or the essential material for an atomic bomb. More on Iran
 
Jerry Michael Blanchard Sentenced To Prison For Threatening To Shoot, Kill Obama Last Year Top
CHARLOTTE, N.C. — A North Carolina man has been sentenced to one year and one day in prison for threatening to shoot and kill Barack Obama when he was the Democratic candidate for president. The U.S. Attorney's office announced Monday that 48-year-old Jerry Michael Blanchard of Indian Trail also was fined $3,000 and ordered to be under supervised release for three years following his prison term. Blanchard was arrested Aug. 1, 2008. The U.S. Attorney's office says Blanchard threatened to assassinate Obama two separate times that July. One witness told federal authorities that Blanchard said he planned to purchase a pistol. According to a federal affidavit, there was no proof Blanchard tried to carry out the threats. (This version CORRECTS APNewsNow. corrects to Indian Trail in 2nd graf.)
 
Andrew Reinbach: Fracking Is: 1) A Process; 2) An Expletive. Choose One Top
Cooperstown, New York -- Whether gas drilling creates rivers of gold or industrial waste is a matter of opinion. What it definitely creates is legislation. Last week, two members of Congress, Diana DeGette (D.-Colo.) and Maurice Hinchey (D.-NY), said they were re-introducing a 2008 bill to rescind features of a Bush/Cheney bill, the Energy Policy Act of 2005, that exempted energy drillers from important features of the federal Safe Drinking Water Act. The earlier bill died last year in a Republican-controlled committee, but this year it's expected to be reported out of Rep. Henry Waxman's (D-Ca.) Energy and Commerce Committee. Another bill, introduced to the New York Assembly on June 5th by 12 Assembly members, will substantially regulate all gas drilling in the state, including the controversial practice of horizontal drilling and shale fracturing, or "fracking", which uses chemicals some critics say could contaminate ground water with carcinogens and endocrine disruptors. The exact contents of fracking liquids is a well-defended industry secret, but among the deadly chemicals known to be used include benzene, toluene, and diesel fuel. No such laws, or others yet to come, would have appeared without the grassroots activists around the country who pushed an environmental agenda during the Bush/Cheney years. "They're the foot soldiers of the movement," says Amy Mall, senior policy advisor of the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC). "We rely on them." These activists can be remarkably persistent -- and successful. Here, for instance, at the headwaters of the Susquehanna River, a loose coalition of citizen activists called Sustainable Otsego managed, after a long campaign, to prompt the otherwise politically conservative Board of Supervisors to adopt a resolution that will, among other things, make drillers disclose the contents of fracking liquids, and pay for any damage they cause to the local roads and pristine farmlands. In fracking, otherwise known as hydro-fracturing, drillers sink several horizontal wells from a single wellhead; then, under pressure, they pump in millions of gallons of water laced with chemicals and sand. The pressure cracks the shale deposits and releases much more gas than would a conventional well. Most of the fluid is then removed from the well lines; but some remains. The rest is either shipped away, or dumped into a lined, open pit to evaporate; the remaining sludge is later trucked to a disposal site. The ruckus about fracking is about whether the chemicals left underground, or in the sludge ponds, will leach into local aquifers and poison private wells and municipal water supplies. The former danger is a matter of conjecture; while there are many recent reports of people's health being damaged by suspected exposure to fracking liquids, either directly or in drinking water -- some quite compelling -- no such events have been officially confirmed since fracking was introduced to the United States in 1948. Also, water wells are typically no more than 200 feet deep, while gas is typically found thousands of feet below the surface, in wells drillers insist are well protected from leakage. But environmentalists point out that the depth of the wells means that left-over fracking liquids would migrate from such depths over long periods -- at least 30 years -- so that any potential contamination wouldn't emerge for years. These groups likewise say that the industry wants to keep the contents of fracking liquids a secret because there would be a direct line of responsibility -- and legal liability -- between fracking and contamination, if any fracking chemical ever did appear in local drinking water. They also point out that the danger isn't limited to underground water supplies. Last week, the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette reported that a leaking pipe at a local Marcellus drilling site sent stored fracking liquid into a small stream that feeds a lake in a popular park; the contamination killed fish and other water critters for three-quarters of a mile downstream. The Post-Gazette reports that Pennsylvania's Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) has taken water samples above and below the leak, and is mulling appropriate action. But at least the Pennsylvania DEC discovered the spill. In New York, there are reportedly only 18 drilling-related DEC field investigators on staff, while the gas industry already has 13,000 wells in operation, and expects to sink another 15,000 or so once the Marcellus play begins in earnest. The DEC likes to insist that drillers are liable for the damage they cause; but it all depends on that handful of inspectors. And after all, speeding is against the law too, though people have been known to occasionally exceed the speed limit. The spur to the recent spate of laws is the ongoing development of the Marcellus formation, a rich deposit of gas-bearing shale stretching from the southern border of West Virginia to New York's Route 20, which parallels the Mohawk Valley. The Marcellus deposits are estimated to contain anywhere from 1.9 trillion cubic feet of gas -- according to the U.S. Geological Survey -- to 50 trillion cubic feet, worth some $1 Trillion, according to a study by Professors Terry Englander of Pennsylvania State University, and Gary Lash of the State University of New York at Fredonia. Numbers like that, combined with the fact that developing our natural gas resources is national strategic policy, mean that anybody who stands in front of that freight train to stop it will wind up a wet spot. Not even the NRDC opposes responsible development of the Marcellus, or similar deposits in Texas, Colorado, Wyoming and elsewhere; the key word being "responsible." All in all, it seems unlikely that the Bush/Cheney approach to energy policy, openly displayed in the 2005 exemptions for drillers to the Safe Drinking Water Act, will survive much longer; the obvious trend is to regulate, or re-regulate, with an eye towards protecting the environment and, by extension, the health of local citizens. The premise, of course, is that responsible adults clean up after themselves. Predictably, the energy industry is lumbering on with the usual claims that the oppressive costs of such onerous regulation will stop gas drilling in its tracks. But the all-in cost per well of compliance with these laws is estimated to be about $100,000, which doesn't seem much against the millions of dollars per month thrown off by a successful well. The worst that can be said about those costs is that it would force drillers to concentrate on the most promising wells; looked at this way, these laws are doing drillers a favor. The other argument, heard in a June 4th hearing of Congress' Natural Resources Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Resources, is more subtle -- that regulating gas drilling should be left to the states. But opponents will doubtless counter with Congress' powers to regulate interstate commerce. Even energy industry lobbyists concede privately that in this game they've got a weak hand, a dwindling pile of chips, and few powerful allies who can step in to save their bacon.
 
Sarah Palin Shows Up At GOP Fundraiser Despite Lack Of Speaking Role Top
WASHINGTON — Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin appeared at a Republican congressional fundraiser Monday night, ending a will-she-or-won't-she mystery that overshadowed the event and frustrated the GOP. Palin _ the party's 2008 vice presidential nominee who was initially slated to headline the annual Senate-House dinner _ left organizers hanging as late as Monday afternoon after she was told she wouldn't have a speaking role at the event. It was the latest twist in an unusual public flap between the potential 2012 presidential candidate and the Republican congressional leaders who run the party's fundraising committees. In March, organizers replaced Palin as the keynote speaker with former House Speaker Newt Gingrich after she wavered over accepting the invitation. She hadn't been expected to attend until last week, when her advisers approached organizers saying she would be near Washington and would like to come. Republican officials involved in the discussions, who spoke on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the matter, said Palin was invited to sit at a head table but was told she would not be given a chance to speak for fear that she might overshadow Gingrich. Palin balked at that arrangement but did not make clear whether she would refuse to attend, the officials said. Sen. John Cornyn of Texas, chairman of the National Republican Senatorial Committee, made a personal appeal over the weekend for her to attend and invited her and her husband, Todd Palin, to sit at his table. Late Monday afternoon, the officials said Palin's aides had informed organizers that she and her husband would attend, although a spokeswoman for the governor's political committee would not confirm that. Palin catapulted to fame last year as presidential candidate John McCain's running mate and is widely believed to be eyeing a presidential bid in 2012. In March, Cornyn's committee and its House counterpart, the National Republican Congressional Committee, put out a news release saying she would be the keynote speaker at the dinner, which is one of the party's largest fundraisers. Palin's representatives said later that the governor never confirmed that she would speak and wanted to make sure the event did not interfere with state business. Gingrich also has been mentioned as a possible presidential candidate in 2012, and the confusion over the fundraiser comes as Palin is denying an allegation that a speech she recently gave borrowed heavily from an article he co-wrote. Responding to an accusation from a blogger on the Huffington Post Web site, Palin's attorney said the governor gave Gingrich proper credit when she used some of his material about former President Ronald Reagan. ____ Associated Press writer Beth Fouhy in New York contributed to this report. More on Sarah Palin
 
Robert Naiman: Simon Johnson: Via IMF, Our Tax Money Will Bail Out Eurobanks Top
The official story is that the $108 billion for the International Monetary Fund that the House leadership wants to attach to the war supplemental on Tuesday is "global stimulus," "foreign aid," "money for poor people in poor countries." Critics like Mark Weisbrot of the Center for Economic and Policy Research say this is a ruse, and that the money is intended to bail out European banks from their exposure in Eastern Europe. Weisbrot notes that Almost all of the agreements that the IMF has concluded since the global economic crisis began have included the opposite of stimulus programs: for example spending cuts or interest rate increases. The amount of money that will help poor countries is tiny. And it is difficult to see why the IMF would need hundreds of billions of dollars to help governments with balance of payments support: for sixteen Standby Arrangements negotiated since the crisis intensified last year, the total has been less than $46 billion. On the other hand, European banks are facing potential losses in the hundreds of billions of dollars. Some, like France's Societe Generale, have already gotten billions of dollars from the TARP bailout. If the purpose of adding these vast sums to the IMF's coffers is to bail out these banks, then the taxpayers of the United States (and other countries who are being asked to contribute) ought to know about it. Who should you believe about the purpose of the money - the House leadership, or the critics? Well, Simon Johnson, former chief economist at the International Monetary Fund, appears to be weighing in with the critics , at least in terms of his understanding of what the IMF is doing: First and foremost, we are looking at a creditor bailout-type situation. Latvia is receiving large amounts of foreign financial assistance - from the IMF and the European Union - with the express purpose of making all payments due on its debts (mostly owed to West European banks; thank you, Sweden). This is strikingly reminiscent of Latin America after 1982: above all else, protect the foreign banks. This is what the House leadership doesn't want you to know. They want $108 billion in American tax dollars to bail out European banks from their exposure in Eastern Europe. And they want the money to be approved as quickly as possible, because each day that the IMF money isn't approved is another day during which more people will find out what's going on. But if the money for the IMF is approved, expect press reports about how the IMF is bailing out European banks with U.S. tax dollars - stories that will be amplified by right-wing media. As Jane Hamsher notes , right-wing bloggers are already targeting Blue Dogs who vote for the IMF bailout - the international version of the controversial TARP. She cites Erick Erickson at Red State : It is bad enough that we're bailing out domestic banks. Barack Obama now wants to bail out European banks via funding for the International Monetary Fund ("IMF"). Hamsher writes : The Blue Dogs are especially vulnerable to this dynamic. By forcing them to heel on this bill, Rahm is writing their 2010 GOP attack ads -- "Voted for $100 billion bailout of European Banks." That ought to go over well. The right-wing blogosphere has already caught on that the IMF funding is about bailing out European banks. Will Democrats find out before it's too late? More on The Bailouts
 
GOP Seizes Control Of State Senate Top
Republicans regained control of the New York State Senate on Monday afternoon, winning support from two dissident Democrats in a surprise power-sharing deal. The sudden coup effectively ended Democratic control of Albany after five months and allowed Dean G. Skelos of Long Island to reclaim the title of majority leader, replacing Malcolm A. Smith of Queens.
 
Stolen Artifacts Worth Millions Being Returned To Italy Top
CHICAGO — Thousands of Italian artifacts _ including a handwritten document by Benito Mussolini and antiquities dating to 900 B.C. _ were found in the home of a late collectibles dealer, the FBI announced Monday. Nearly half the items were identified as stolen and will be returned to Italy, the FBI said. The collection, worth between $5 million and $10 million, had been shipped to John Sisto during two decades by his father, who lived in Italy and likely bought the treasures from thieves who looted them from private collections, the FBI said. Sisto's relatives discovered the some 3,500 artifacts, manuscripts and antiquities squirreled away in boxes in his Berwyn home after his death in 2007. The collection includes hundreds of Etruscan artifacts produced between 900 B.C. and 500 B.C., parchments and manuscripts, some with wax papal seals dating to the 12th century, and more than 1,000 books and documents written by kings and popes. It also includes a more modern document handwritten by the fascist dictator Mussolini: his handwritten preface to the book "Dux" by Margherita Sarfatti, published in 1926. FBI agents believe Sisto's father, Giuseppe "Joseph" Sisto, sent the items to his son with an eye to selling them for a profit. But the younger Sisto "appeared to be more interested in the historical value of these items than the monetary value and that is why he kept most of them there," FBI spokesman Ross Rice said. Most of the items appear to have come from the Bari region in southern Italy. They most likely started to arrive in the early 1960s and continued to be shipped to Berwyn until the elder Sisto died in 1982. Authorities don't know whether some items were sold to collectors. "Whatever additional items were sent here we wouldn't know," Rice said. The FBI is not prosecuting anyone in the Chicago area in connection with the thefts. Italian authorities will have to determine whether to file charges against anyone under that country's cultural property laws, the FBI said. "Not only do thefts such as these result in a significant monetary loss, but they also deprive the world of part of its cultural history," said Robert D. Grant, special agent in charge of the FBI's Chicago office.
 
Lieberman-Graham Amendment Removed From Supplemental Top
Jane Hamsher of Firedoglake.com is reporting that the Lieberman-Graham amendment to suppress detainee photos "is out of the conference report of the supplemental." The Huffington Post confirmed that the provision has indeed been removed from the bill. The war supplemental had been weighted down both by it and a $108 billion line of credit for the IMF. With Republicans threatening to oppose the war money because of the IMF funding, Democratic leadership couldn't afford to lose left-wing Democrats who were opposed to the FOIA provision. The left-right alliance was making it hard for leadership to get the necessary votes. A Democratic aide said that leadership was whipping furiously all day Monday to try to line up support for the bill. Shaving the FOIA provision will get them closer to the votes needed, but might not get them over the top. The IMF provision is still in the bill and is a top Obama priority. It came under fierce attack from House Republicans who wanted a "clean" war supplemental and many Democrats had no love the the extension of the credit line. Democrats on the left have long opposed the IMF for forcing developing nations to cut social spending in exchange for IMF loans. Democrats in the center were having a hard time explaining to constituents at home why now was the time to extend the credit to the IMF, especially as Republicans -- aided by the conservative blog RedState -- ripped it as a US taxpayer-funded bailout for foreign countries.
 

CREATE MORE ALERTS:

Auctions - Find out when new auctions are posted

Horoscopes - Receive your daily horoscope

Music - Get the newest Album Releases, Playlists and more

News - Only the news you want, delivered!

Stocks - Stay connected to the market with price quotes and more

Weather - Get today's weather conditions




You received this email because you subscribed to Yahoo! Alerts. Use this link to unsubscribe from this alert. To change your communications preferences for other Yahoo! business lines, please visit your Marketing Preferences. To learn more about Yahoo!'s use of personal information, including the use of web beacons in HTML-based email, please read our Privacy Policy. Yahoo! is located at 701 First Avenue, Sunnyvale, CA 94089.
Posted by at

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)