Sunday, May 31, 2009

Y! Alert: The Full Feed from HuffingtonPost.com

Yahoo! Alerts
My Alerts

The latest from The Full Feed from HuffingtonPost.com

Shannyn Moore: Christian Fundamentalist Terrorism Top
Christian Fundamentalist Terrorism. It's shocking to write. But it's time to start calling it what it is. When Jim D. Adkisson walked into the Tennessee Valley Unitarian Universalist Church with 76 rounds and a shot-gun, he killed 2 people and was charged with murder. His motive was "he hated the liberal movement" and was upset with "liberals in general as well as gays." He should have been charged with terrorism. Today, George Tiller, the Wichita doctor was killed INSIDE the lobby of his Wichita church. Reformation Lutheran Church became a crime scene; fundamentalist terrorism. The right wing media hacks make targets of the left. The fundamentalist reverends blather their intolerance of other Americans. Their marriages are in jeopardy if the GLBT community can walk down an aisle. Their children are going to be molested if you have to rent to a same sex couple. Fear...fear...fear the queer. Bill O'Reilly's hit piece on Dr. Tiller is a training tape for Christian Fundamentalist Terrorists. Never did he ask the woman interviewed how she, as a 13 year old, got pregnant or where her parents were when she went underwent an abortion at Dr. Tiller's clinic. I'm sure O'Reilly's drivel will insist on personal accountability for the murderer. I'm sure he won't be in line for any "accountability" for calling the doctor "Tiller the baby-killer" or his clinic a "death mill." Are anti-choice groups celebrating today? An abortion doctor is dead so women won't have unwanted pregnancies! The "war on terror" needs to include domestic terrorists. More on Bill O'Reilly
 
Andy Borowitz: Bush Charges $150,000 to Speak; $1.5 Million to Speak in English Top
Former president George W. Bush has let it be known that he is available to speak on the corporate lecture circuit for $150,000 and will be willing to speak in English for $1.5 million. Tracy Klugian, Mr. Bush's agent and head of the Ex-Presidential Speakers Bureau, explained the disparity in fees: "He is charging ten times as much to speak in English because it requires ten times the effort." Mr. Bush came to the decision to charge the higher rate for speaking in English after an appearance in Toronto last week with former President Bill Clinton, an experience which he found "draining." "President Bush didn't realize he was expected to speak in English at the event, since it was in Canada," his agent explained. Mr. Klugian said that despite the lofty fee, he had already fielded several offers from corporations who would like to hear the former President speak in English: "I think it's the novelty factor." But the President's agent said he has had to politely decline requests to have Mr. Bush speak in complete sentences: "I tell them, 'Thanks, but you can't afford that.'" Subscribe for free to The Borowitz Report here . More on Bill Clinton
 
Dan Dorfman: Short Seller Goes Long the Future Top
When we're young, we build castles in the sand. And when we grow up, some of us build empires. Robert Wilson, a retired 82-year-old investment legend, never did get around to building an empire. But he managed to dazzle Wall Street with a remarkable achievement. Namely, he parlayed $15,000 that his parents gave him in the 1940s into an astonishing $800 million net worth. During the 1970s, an essentially flat period for the market, Wilson, a renowned short seller (a bettor that stock prices will go down, not up), wowed Wall Street with his money-making prowess by racking up a snazzy 30% annual gain, Now he's wowing the philanthropic world with what he's doing with his money. Very few rich folks give away the bulk of their wealth when they're still alive. Not only that, many wealthy individuals, given their hefty stock market losses, have dramatically cut back on their charitable contributions. Not so Wilson, who also has incurred large market losses. Over the last 10 years he has given away about $500 million to various charities and he figures he has at least another $100 million to go. His intent, he explains, is to encourage other people to follow his lead since charities constantly need money "and I'm not going to live forever." His charitable interest largely centers on conservation -- that is, conservation of buildings, land, oceans, endangered animals and the air we breathe. Likewise, environmental protection is another of his favorites. Among his principal beneficiaries have been the Public Library, which Wilson describes as a conservator of books; Environmental Defense, one of whose concerns is global warming; the World Monumental Fund, which is in the business of preserving beautiful buildings around the world, and the Nature Conservancy, which acquires land to prevent it from being developed and thus enable wild life and vegetation to be preserved. One of his current pet charitable efforts involves initiatives to preserve Roman Catholic schools, notably those catering to kindergarten through the eighth grade, which are closing left and right, by encouraging their alumni to take a more active role in prolonging their lifespan. In a sense, observes one of his Wall Street buddies Wilson is using his money to bet on the country's future. "He's not hoarding paintings or collecting antique cars, but he's using his money to create a better America. It's philanthropy at its best." What's ahead for investors in these troubled times? Nothing to cheer about, according to Wilson. His outlook for the economy, as well as the stock market, is pretty abysmal. He sees a relative period of stagnation for both, at least over the next five years, similar, he says, to the 1970s, a difficult decade which was characterized by a troubled economy, accelerated inflation and student uprisings. Making matters worse, he envisions significant problems stemming from higher taxes, escalating costs of medical care, the inability of the consumer to spend as much as in the past and weak exports. The Obama administration is viewed as negative for the market, partly because of it's hostility to the past (chiefly a reference to the prospects of higher taxes for the rich and everybody else), Wilson also feels President Obama won't be able to accomplish much because he's beholden to the medical unions and will be unable to temper sharply rising medical costs, including pricey life-extending drugs. His advice to the average investor: "I would avoid the stock market and put my money in short-term Treasuries and savings accounts and wait for interest rates to go up, which they're already doing on the long end." Describing himself as "an old man now," Wilson says "anyone who thinks they're young at 82 is on their way to dementia." Still though, he remains an active 82-year-old. A world traveler, a lover of the arts and a former chairman of the New York City Opera, Wilson exercises 45 minutes a day and he's still running. In July, he'll be off to Paris for art exhibitions and then on to London for some theatre. After that, he's bound for Liverpool and northern Wales. Born in Detroit, Wilson, the son of a fire and casualty insurance agent, kicked off his career in the investment arena in 1949 at the age of 23 as a trainee at First Boston. He left for a two-year stint in the Army (1951 and 1952) and then returned to First Boston as a securities analyst. Subsequently, he worked for a number of other investment firms and went out on his own in the late 1960s. Then in 1969, he started Robert Wilson Associates, a hedge fund for family and friends, and soon thereafter he gained a reputation as Wall Street's premier short seller. He retired in 1986 and placed most of his assets with a group of money managers. Unfortunately, they couldn't match Wilson's standard of performance, causing him the loss of a fair amount of money. I always thought Wilson's great success largely reflected his ability to spot the difference between authenticity and pretention. He sees it somewhat differently, noting "I was always net long (meaning he owed more stocks than he was short) no matter how bearish I was since I never wanted to get up in the morning hoping things would be worse." More on Financial Crisis
 
Scott Mendelson: Does Sony and The Taking of Pelham 1 2 3 actually benefit from the death of John Travolta's son? Top
The big gossip news today is that John Travolta will not be doing publicity for Sony's upcoming The Taking of Pelham 1 2 3 . Fair enough. The man lost his sixteen year old son in a freak incident just six months ago, so the idea of doing a junket and/or appearing on the late-night talk shows is probably not very appealing right now. But here's the awkward situation. It stands to argue that the news that Travolta is not doing publicity, as revealed by the film's costar (Denzel Washington), makes for a bigger media splash than if Travolta had just gone out and done the traditional publicity tour. Surely if his son had not just died, the footage of Travolta doing this appearance or that appearance wouldn't be the least bit noteworthy. Furthermore, if Travolta had gone the publicity route, having just buried his kid, each appearance and each interview would have been front page fodder for the gossip rags and gossipy news sites (such as, sad to say, Huffington Post's entertainment section ). Either he opens up about his grief and every quote becomes a 'must read heart breaker', or he completely focuses on the film, which then is a news story in and of itself ("Why won't he talk about it? Is he in denial?" the tabloids will scream). Point being, from a purely objective point of view, can we not conclude that the death of Jett Travolta is actually a boon for Sony marketing and those who desire that The Taking Of Pelham 1 2 3 open well in two weeks? Just as the death of Health Ledger and the prostitution-related arrest of Hugh Grant gave an added boost to their respective projects, John Travolta's family tragedy will have the effect of turning an arbitrary publicity tour (by Washington and others involved in the film) into a genuine news story that will place the film in the fore minds of readers and viewers everywhere. Sad to say, but the death of Travolta's son is nothing but good news for the financial success of his latest picture. Scott Mendelson More on Heath Ledger
 
Israel throws out proposed 'loyalty law' Top
JERUSALEM — The Israeli government on Sunday threw out a proposal aimed at minority Arabs to require an oath of loyalty to Israel as a Jewish state or risk losing their citizenship, dealing a blow to the country's ultranationalist foreign minister, who spearheaded the proposal. Avigdor Lieberman, a rising force in Israeli politics, made the proposal a central plank of his election campaign last February. The message, which sought to play on the perceived disloyalty of Israel's Arab citizens, helped propel his Yisrael Beitenu Party to a strong third place finish in the parliamentary vote. Lieberman's electoral success was seen as evidence of growing polarization between Israel's Jewish and Arab citizens. Many Israeli Arabs, once considering themselves bridges between Israel and the Arab world, have become alienated in the Jewish state and side openly with the Palestinians in their struggle against Israel. Arabs make up about one-fifth of Israel's 7 million citizens. The draft would have allowed the Interior Ministry to strip even native Israelis of their nationality if they refused to swear allegiance to the Jewish state and "its symbols and values" and profess their willingness to perform military service. Cabinet Secretary Tzvi Hauser said the proposal was rejected 8-3 by a ministerial committee on legislation. With the exception of Yisrael Beitenu, all parties in the government, including Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's Likud, opposed the proposal. Netanyahu has not commented on the draft. Many Israelis have described the proposal as racist. It also met resistance from the ultra-Orthodox Shas Party because it could have affected ultra-Orthodox Jews, most of whom are currently exempt from military service on religious grounds and would not be eager to endorse the symbols and values of the state, which they consider too secular. Unlike Palestinians in the neighboring West Bank and Gaza Strip, Israel's Arabs hold full citizenship rights, but they have suffered from discrimination for decades and have little identification with a country that defines itself as Jewish. The most obvious difference between the two communities is military service. Jewish Israelis and Druse Arabs are required to perform three years in the military. Other Arabs are not, though small numbers volunteer. Approval of the bill could have been embarrassing at a time when Israel is under U.S. pressure to make conciliatory moves toward the Palestinians and renew peace efforts with the broader Arab and Muslim world. Arab lawmaker Jamal Zahalka praised Sunday's decision "as a victory for the Arab public and for sanity." Yisrael Beitenu can still try to get it passed into law as an independent initiative, although it appears unlikely to garner majority support in the legislature. "Yisrael Beitenu will continue to act for Israel's basis as a Jewish, Zionist and democratic state and will fight against disloyalty and the negative exploitation of Israeli democracy," the party said after the vote. The party is also sponsoring a separate proposal making it illegal for Arabs to mourn the "catastrophe" _ the term Palestinians use to describe their defeat and exile of hundreds of thousands in the war that surrounded Israel's founding. That bill has received preliminary approval to go ahead but still needs to pass repeated readings in parliament before becoming law. It would mandate a three-year prison sentence for anyone who participates in public protests or commemorations mourning the establishment of the state of Israel. The legislation has been criticized as a blow to free speech. More on Israel
 
Cancer Immune Therapies Finally Working Top
ORLANDO, Fla. — First there was surgery, then chemotherapy and radiation. Now, doctors have overcome 30 years of false starts and found success with a fourth way to fight cancer: using the body's natural defender, the immune system. The approach is called a cancer vaccine, although it treats the disease rather than prevents it. At a cancer conference Sunday, researchers said one such vaccine kept a common form of lymphoma from worsening for more than a year. That's huge in this field, where progress is glacial and success with a new treatment is often measured in weeks or even days. Experimental vaccines against three other cancers _ prostate, the deadly skin disease melanoma and an often fatal childhood tumor called neuroblastoma _ also gave positive results in late-stage testing in recent weeks, after decades of struggles in the lab. "I don't know what we did differently to make the breakthrough," said Dr. Len Lichtenfeld of the American Cancer Society. Instead of a single "A-Ha!" moment, there have been many "ah, so" discoveries about the immune system that now seem to be paying off, said Dr. John Niederhuber, director of the National Cancer Institute. It's way too soon to declare victory. No one knows how long the benefits will last, whether people will need "boosters" to keep their disease in check, or whether vaccines will ever be a cure. Many vaccines must be custom-made for each patient. How practical will that be, and what will it cost? Those are all good questions _ but there are no answers yet, said Dr. Richard Schilsky, a University of Chicago cancer specialist who is president of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. Several vaccine studies were reported over the weekend at the oncology group's annual meeting in Florida. A big problem has been getting the immune system to "see" cancer as a threat, said Dr. Patrick Hwu, melanoma chief at the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center. Viruses like the flu or polio are easily spotted by the immune system because they look different from human cells. "But cancer comes from our own cells. And so it's more like guerrilla warfare _ the immune system has trouble distinguishing the normal cells from the cancer cells," he said. To help it do that, many cancer vaccines take a substance from a cancer cell's surface and attach it to something the immune system already recognizes as foreign _ in the lymphoma vaccine's case, a shellfish protein. "It's a mimic to what you're trying to kill, a training device to train the immune system to kill something," Hwu explained. To make the attack as strong as possible, doctors add a substance to put the immune system on high alert. Dr. Stephen Schuster of the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine led a study testing BiovaxID, an experimental vaccine against follicular lymphoma developed by the National Cancer Institute. Rights to it are now held by Biovest International Inc. of Worcester, Mass., and some of his co-researchers have financial ties to the company. To be in the study, patients had to have achieved a remission for at least six months with standard chemo. This often occurs with this type of lymphoma, but the disease usually comes back. Researchers gave 41 patients the shellfish protein and an immune booster; 76 other patients were given those plus the vaccine. After nearly five years of followup, the average time until the cancer worsened was 44 months in the vaccine group and 30 months in the others. Big gains also were seen with a neuroblastoma vaccine developed by the cancer institute. In a study of 226 patients, 86 percent of vaccine recipients were still alive after two years versus 75 percent of others not given the vaccine. Results were released by the oncology society two weeks ago. The benefits from a melanoma vaccine developed by the cancer institute were more modest. It extended the time until patients relapsed _ three months versus one and a half for those not given the vaccine. Hilde Stapleton, 53, of suburban Houston, is one of the lucky ones it helped. Still, she found what many other vaccine recipients have learned: The vaccine had few side effects, but the immune system boosters were "like the worst case of flu you've ever had," she said. The prostate cancer vaccine, Provenge, is farthest along. Its maker, Seattle-based Dendreon Corp., is seeking federal Food and Drug Administration approval for it. A study last month found that it extended survival by four months in men with very advanced disease. Doctors unconnected with these experiments are cautiously optimistic. "We've raised so many false hopes in the past," said Lichtenfeld of the Cancer Society. "What's different this time is we have the science reports to back up improvements." ___On the Net: Cancer meeting: http://www.asco.org National Cancer Institute: http://www.cancer.gov More on Health
 
Feinstein Answers Republicans: "Judges Do Make Policy" Top
Republicans hit the airwaves -- and President Obama's first nominee for the Supreme Court -- hard this week, calling Judge Sonia Sotomayor racist and accusing her of using the courts to create policy. And on CBS's "Face the Nation," Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) hit back. Sotomayor is an activist judge, Republicans argue, and doesn't want simply to interpret the law, but rather to make law from the bench. They cite a much-repeated statement she made at a forum at Duke University. "Court of appeals is where policy is made," Sotomayor said. Feinstein, breaking a Washington taboo, responded by pointing out the obvious: Regardless of what Republicans think about it, judges do, in fact, make policy, Feinstein said. "There's a lot of comment about the fact, well, she makes policy. There's another comment she made on the fact that judges make policy," said Feinstein. "And the traditional rejoinder to that is judges do not make policy. In my experience, 16 years on the committee, that's not true. If there is no precedent, judges do make policy. If there is no precedent, an appellate court judge will, in effect, by their opinion, make policy." Feinstein pointed to a case of a student who was strip searched on suspicion of having illicit possession of Ibuprofen in school, which was argued before the Supreme Court in April, as an example of the courts making policy. "Now, there's no precedent," Feinstein said. "The Supreme Court will be making policy in that regard. I think that has to be clearly understood by people." More on Sonia Sotomayor
 
Nadal Loses In French Open 2009: Defeated By Robin Soderling Top
PARIS — Rafael Nadal's unbeaten run at the French Open is over. The four-time defending champion lost in a stunning upset to Robin Soderling of Sweden 6-2, 6-7 (2), 6-4, 7-6 (2) Sunday in the fourth round, ending the Spaniard's record 31-match winning streak at Roland Garros. Soderling, seeded 23rd at this year's tournament, ran Nadal ragged on center court with his hard serve and booming forehand. "When one player plays bad, (he) must lose," Nadal said. "(It) was my fault. ... I didn't play my best tennis and for that reason I lose." Nadal has dominated the French Open since his first match on the red clay at Roland Garros. In his 31 previous matches, he had lost only seven sets _ the last one coming against Roger Federer in the 2007 final. "I played well today, but I think I played some even better matches in my career," said the 24-year-old Soderling, who called Nadal "the greatest clay-court player of all time." "I worked good with my forehand, and my backhand worked well, as well. I worked my backhand flat and tried to go around and hit my forehand. I think I played exactly the way I wanted to play before the match. I served well, extremely well, and that really, really helped me today." Defending women's champion Ana Ivanovic also lost, while top-seeded Dinara Safina advanced to the quarterfinals with another easy win. Maria Sharapova joined her with a fourth straight three-set win. Also on the men's side, No. 3 Andy Murray of Britain, No. 10 Nikolay Davydenko of Russia and No. 12 Fernando Gonzalez of Chile made the quarterfinals. Soderling finished with 59 unforced errors, more than twice as many as Nadal's 28, but the Swede's 30 forehand winners made up some ground on the top-ranked Spaniard. "He didn't surprise me because I know how he plays and how dangerous he can be," said Nadal, who said he failed to attack Soderling. "I didn't play aggressive." The crowd at Court Philippe Chatrier was split, many cheering for Nadal to continue his record run but others supporting Soderling. "Maybe at one stage they supported Soderling more than me, and that was a bit sad," Nadal said. "But I wish when I'm back they can support me a bit more in key moments." Nadal and Soderling played three times previously, with the Spaniard winning all three. But the middle match, which came in the third round at the 2007 Wimbledon tournament, was easily the most contentious. That match took five days to complete _ from when the pair first stepped on Court No. 1 to warm up _ due to rain and the traditional middle Sunday day off. Things got heated when Soderling, who also tugged at the back of his shorts to mimic Nadal at one point, pumped a fist instead of offering a customary "sorry about that" wave after winning a point on a net cord. In the second-set tiebreaker Sunday, Nadal hit the tape with a backhand and the ball toppled over to give him a 5-0 lead. Instead of just a quick wave, Nadal held both arms up to apologize. On Sunday, Soderling wouldn't be goaded into saying anything bad about Nadal. "I've been answering these questions now for two years. I mean, I'm feeling pretty tired of this," Soderling said. "He's just another player on the tour." The last time two defending champions lost in the same round at a Grand Slam tournament was in 2004, when Justine Henin and Juan Carlos Ferrero lost in the second round of the French Open. Only four times in the Open era have both defending champions failed to reach the quarterfinals at Roland Garros. Nadal had won three of the last four major titles, missing out only on the U.S. Open. After winning the Australian Open, he had a chance to complete a Grand Slam this year. Defending his Wimbledon title will be Nadal's next major goal, but that will come after a little rest and relaxation. "Right now, my preparation is for the swimming pool at my house," joked Nadal, who was also trying to become the first man to win five straight French Open titles. "Give me three more days." The draw has now opened up for three-time finalist Federer. The former No. 1 needs only to win the French Open title to complete a career Grand Slam, and his road got clearer Saturday when potential semifinal opponent Novak Djokovic was eliminated. The eighth-seeded Ivanovic did little right on Court Suzanne Lenglen, converting two of five break points and making 20 unforced errors in a 6-2, 6-3 loss to Victoria Azarenka of Belarus. Before the final game of the first set, Ivanovic called for a trainer to look at her neck. Azarenka then held to take the lead, and broke Ivanovic's serve in the first and third games of the second set to take a 4-0 lead. "I just suddenly started feeling so dizzy, and I completely lost my balance," said Ivanovic, who won her only Grand Slam tournament title at last year's French Open. "Ever since then it was really hard. I struggled with looking up. I started feeling very dizzy, and I was struggling a little bit to find my balance." The 19-year-old Azarenka lost in the fourth round at Roland Garros last year, and will next be playing in the quarterfinals of a Grand Slam tournament for the first time. Safina had a much easier time on center court, advancing to the quarterfinals with a 6-1, 6-0 win over Aravane Rezai of France. The top-seeded Russian won 11 straight games to close out the match. She has lost only five games through four rounds, and has won four of the eight sets she has played at love. "It's really like five games that I lost before getting into the quarters," Safina said. "It's not a bad feeling, and I hope if I continue like this I can go a long way." Safina took over the No. 1 ranking this year, but she has yet to win a Grand Slam title. She lost to Ivanovic in last year's French Open final, and fell to Serena Williams in this year's Australian Open title match. Sharapova rallied again, this time beating Li Na of China 4-6, 6-0, 6-4. The unseeded Russian is making her return to Grand Slam tennis after almost a year off due to a right shoulder injury. She lost the first set of her matches in the first and third rounds, and lost the middle set in the second round. The three-time major champion needs only a title at Roland Garros for a career Grand Slam. No. 20 Dominika Cibulkova advanced by beating No. 29 Agnes Szavay of Hungary 6-2, 6-4 in a sloppy match that had a combined 17 winners and 66 unforced errors. Back on the men's side, Gonzalez became the first player to reach the quarterfinals, beating Victor Hanescu of Romania 6-2, 6-4, 6-2, and Murray followed with a 7-5, 7-6 (4), 6-1 win over No. 13 Marin Cilic of Croatia. Gonzalez, who reached the 2007 Australian Open final, ended the match with his 21st forehand winner. He finished with 50 winners and only 16 unforced errors. "I tried to win every point," said Gonzalez, who will face Murray in the next round. "And then I'm trying to not be risky if I don't need it. Maybe I got a break, and then I can start to hit my huge shots." More on Sports
 
George Tiller Killed: Abortion Doctor Shot At Church Top
***UPDATE*** The AP reports that a suspect is in custody: A Wichita city official says a suspect is in custody in the shooting death of late-term abortion provider George Tiller. The city official spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to speak publicly about the case. The official did not provide additional details. An attorney for Tiller, Dan Monnat, says the doctor was shot Sunday as he served as an usher during morning services at Reformation Lutheran Church. Monnat said Tiller's wife, Jeanne, was in the choir at the time of the shooting. WICHITA, Kansas -- Dr. George Tiller, a Kansas doctor whose clinic received national attention for performing late-term abortions, was shot to death as he entered his Wichita church on Sunday. "Members of the congregation who were inside the sanctuary at the time of the shooting were being kept inside the church by police," the Wichita Eagle reported , "and those arriving were being ushered into the parking lot." Media reports said the suspected killer fled the scene in a blue Taurus. Police described him as a white male in his 50s or 60s. Tiller has been among the few U.S. physicians performing late-term abortion, making him a favored target of anti-abortion protesters. He testified that he and his family have suffered years of harassment and threats. His clinic was the site of the 1991 "Summer of Mercy" protests marked by mass demonstrations and arrests. His clinic was bombed in 1985, and an abortion opponent shot him in both arms in 1993. Tiller's clinic also provided group and individual counseling, as well as chaplain and funeral services for people who were grieving. The anti-abortion group Operation Rescue, which runs a " Tiller Watch " feature on its website, released a statement condemning the shooting. "We are shocked at this morning's disturbing news that Mr. Tiller was gunned down. Operation Rescue has worked for years through peaceful, legal means, and through the proper channels to see him brought to justice. We denounce vigilantism and the cowardly act that took place this morning. We pray for Mr. Tiller's family that they will find comfort and healing that can only be found in Jesus Christ." Tiller remained prominent in the news in recent years, in part because of an investigation begun by former Kansas Attorney General Phill Kline, an abortion opponent. Prosecutors had alleged that Tiller had gotten second opinions from a doctor who was essentially an employee of his, not independent as state law requires, but a jury in March acquitted him of all 19 misdemeanor counts against him. Abortion opponents also questioned then-Gov. Kathleen Sebelius' ties to Tiller before the Senate confirmed her this year as U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary. Tiller donated thousands of dollars to Sebelius over the years.
 

CREATE MORE ALERTS:

Auctions - Find out when new auctions are posted

Horoscopes - Receive your daily horoscope

Music - Get the newest Album Releases, Playlists and more

News - Only the news you want, delivered!

Stocks - Stay connected to the market with price quotes and more

Weather - Get today's weather conditions




You received this email because you subscribed to Yahoo! Alerts. Use this link to unsubscribe from this alert. To change your communications preferences for other Yahoo! business lines, please visit your Marketing Preferences. To learn more about Yahoo!'s use of personal information, including the use of web beacons in HTML-based email, please read our Privacy Policy. Yahoo! is located at 701 First Avenue, Sunnyvale, CA 94089.
Posted by at

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)